Friday, May 23, 2008

Another Glaring Inconsistency Regarding The "War On Terror"

I did like Chuck Baldwins most recent column but I thought a part of it's text should have been the title, "Another glaring inconsistency regarding the "war on terror". (Continue Reading) In case you didn't know I do feel Mr. Baldwin is the best choice we have this presidential campaign season. Leaving your borders wide opened has always seemed like a foolish move to me, especially during a time of war. Chuck seems to feel that wide opened borders and a broken immigration policy is something to be concerned about. (Continue Reading) The other candidates are using the war for a campaign issue and ignoring the border. Do they feel that there is no way a potential terrorist could sneak into the country and carry out an an attack? I don't feel that we're any less likely to be attacked now than I did on September 10, 2001.Since the September 11, 2001 attacks I don't feel our elected officials have done much of anything to make it more possible for us to successfully protect ourselves from another attack.

God Bless America, God Save The Republic.

Thanks go to;
Chuck Baldwin Live
September 11 News .com


Blogger Katherine Thayer said...

If some countries attacked U.S. It's automatically war. Look what happen on December 7, 1941, Japan attack the Pearl Harbor. On Dec.8, US declared war to Japan.

12:52 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home